Valentyna Boyko,
retiree:
”I am really sorry that he has gone. It seems to me that he is an honest person and it would be better if he stayed. He said that he is being hindered in making reforms. It is not really reforms, it is fiction. Because of this he decided to go. He did not agree with the policy led by the government. I couldn’t tell if this was true or not, but I trust him.”
Vladislav Borodulya,
programmer:
”I do not know how staff decisions are important in this issue, but I think that the problem is in the system, rather than in individuals. Until the strategy of economic development will not be changed, there will be no progress. I find it hard to judge the motives that led Abromavicius to make such a decision, but in my opinion it is possible that he could just be forced to resign from his post. Such a practice is usual in our country, unfortunately. ”
Peter Danisyuk,
manager:
”I have a positive attitude about his resignation, because everything is going wrong today. From the very beginning I supported him, but the level of economy is at zero now. They can only talk and no more. ”
Yuriy Chavalyuk,
tax consultant:
”I think it is negative. The Ministry of Economy was one of those ministries, where the real changes were visible. I mean the changes with transparency, with the system of public procurement, with a number of deregulation. It is an important fact that his resignation was accompanied with the name of (member of parliament Ihor) Kononenko.”
Ludmila Skotselyas,
homemaker:
”I am pleased that we have not only local people in the government, but also from the outside. It is very important, because they have different from our mentality. But, unfortunately, this system cannot be overcome. It requires a unified political decision of all and a good team … I’m very sorry for him. We need to change everyone from the old system to build the new one.”
