Editor’s Note: Ukraine’s martial law came into effect in 10 Ukrainian oblasts on Nov. 28. The decision came as a reaction to Russia’s attacks on three Ukrainian ships in the Azov Sea three days earlier and the Kremlin’s decision to stop all commercial shipping through the Kerch Strait that connects the Azov and Black seas.
Serhiy Dolhov, Seller of tourism equipment
I do not have any attitude to the introduction of the martial law. It is a machination by the authorities on the eve of the (presidential) elections, an attempt to postpone and influence them.
Iryna Figurska, Retiree
This should have been done long ago. But it is better to do so later than never.
Yelizaveta Stoyanova, Student
I do not have either a positive or negative attitude towards it. First, it is advantageous for (President Petro Poroshenko) as it postpones the (presidential) elections (in March). Second, we will not feel the effects of it in Kyiv, as usual. And, third, there are completely other actions that need to be taken, namely liberating the imprisoned boys.
Hennadiy Kortushin, Retiree
It is a difficult question. On the one hand, these actions are forced (by Russia). But on the other hand, there is political manipulation (in Ukraine). There is a threat indeed (from Russia). But whether the threat counterbalances the political manipulation – it is hard to say.
Anatoliy Sinitskiy, Retired construction worker
My attitude to it is very positive. There is a threat of (Russia) violating Ukraine’s border. And Russia’s behavior is unpredictable. The martial law is an opportunity to be prepared if the president and his team decide that it is necessary.
Inna Zaslavska, Tourist and housewife
I do not know whether I should support it or not. I am not a Ukrainian citizen and I have come here for a visit. I do not have enough information. But I grew up here.
